It looks like the internet archive is needed assistance, I just heard about this today and figured lemmy could help spread this message around

  • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Modern corporations are a damned plague. Most of these fuckers would destroy our whole cultural heritage in a heartbeat if it meant making a profit.

    Yes, corporations exist to make profit, but come on, there are limits.

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      there are limits

      I am glad you have a moral centre.

      But that is the capitalist way. A Redditor once wrote: “*Corporations have no morals, no ethics, no code of conduct, no feelings, no empathy, and zero accountability. They have one goal and one goal only: to increase profits at all costs.”

      Case in point: the climate crisis. Corporations are literally destroying their own home for a symbol of success that, like their products, is man-made: money. It is the ultimate pursuit of vanity.

      Crazy, if you think about it for a moment.

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Europe is voting this weekend. If you care about copyright reform, you should consider voting for the European Pirate Party. IA is probably in the wrong here, legally. But many would argue it’s morally right to have free access to information. Sure, shadow libraries are popping up everywhere and we have access to more information than ever before, but if we really want access for everyone, we need different copyright laws, and for that we need politicians.

    • dko1905@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sadly in countries without a pirate party, like Denmark, you can’t (as far as I know) vote for the EP pirate party.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Does voting for a party like that even help anything? I’m asking because my voting experience is US, and everyone knows how many parties matter here. So I’m curious.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It does a bit, since every party will be represented in the European council based on the number of votes they have. It’s not an election where the winner takes all.

          I think the pirates had one or two representatives in the council, which is enough to start debates and make proposals. They obviously can’t push anything through by themselves.

        • IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yes. In most European countries even small parties can get seats. In my country there are 8 parties in parliament, for example, and 2 of them didn’t use to be there 2 election cycles ago (they were too small/new 8 years ago but eventually grew in popularity and got enough votes for representation).

          Of course if they only have 1 or 2 members in parliament they typcily tend to form coalitions with other like-minded parties so they can get more voting power.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wonder how many people that aren’t from the US running around telling people to vote third party their are, because of what you just described.

  • Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    corporations attack anything that might challenge their ability to make a quick buck: everyone and everything else be damned. sadly the only way to overcome this kind of monster is a decentralized network of information hoarders. appealing lawsuits is just a bandaid.

    the internet archive needs to reorganize. as long as it makes itself into a target as a centralized org, it will also get shot at by soulless corporate husks. im envisioning moving everything onto ipfs, that way anyone can help host as much or little as they like.

  • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why can’t anyone spot a grift anymore? The IA is hugely profitable, and is very clearly crafting PR statements designed to increase donations. Has noone had their trust abused before? If they were trying to make change around this subject they wouldnt be so dishonest in their messaging.

    IA are not Robin Hood.

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Same question here. How can they be profitable if they are a registered non-profit?

        Is it somehow possible to pay employees exorbitant salaries, similar to Mozilla’s CEO?

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Non profit doesn’t mean revenue can’t exceed expenses. It means that the org can’t be owned by investors, and the org can’t pay dividends.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Interesting. And there really is nothing stopping someone in control from getting themselves a huge portion of it, while laying off staff?

            That seems like a huge flaw that someone with the required people skills (read, social engineering) can exploit.

            Anti Commercial-AI license

  • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Fuck.

    I really hope someone gets hold of the data and shares it on p2p or otherwise. If all this data is deleted it would be equivalent to nuking pyramids or burning Picasso paintings.

    • menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Honestly, I’d say it would be much much worse than your examples. It would be erasing parts of history itself.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    ill mention this in every thread about them:

    run the archive team warrior if you can. it helps them archive black boxes like telegram, discord, reddit…

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Didn’t know about this, but sounds like a good cause.

      Is there any legal risk involved with this? Is it recommended to run behind a VPN?

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They made a really dumb move and now have to pay for it. I understand their importance but it doesn’t seem like they do - or they are naive enough to believe corpos have good will.

    They broke law in such a dumb way, and it’s a pity they put their entire project in jeopardy. My only thought while deciding to donate is “what will prevent them from doing something this dumb again?”

    Anti Commercial-AI license