X decried law's "draconian financial penalties," up to $15K per violation per day.

X sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisions::X decried law’s “draconian financial penalties” up to $15K per violation per day.

  • drdiddlybadger@pawb.socialEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t see this going well for X. It’s highly likely they havent been even collecting the appropriate information on their own process at this point.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t required to start until this quarter of this year. They’ve missed, at most, nine days of data.

      I hope the law runs them into the ground, however.

  • spacecadet@lemm.eeEnglish
    12·
    1 year ago

    If Twitter has nothing to hide, then they should have no objection to this bill.

    I can’t believe a lawmaker said this with a straight face. This was the same logic to pass the Patriot Act .

  • spacecadet@lemm.eeEnglish
    03·
    1 year ago

    This may be the one time I side with X. This seems like a massive first amendment right violation. Why did California choose to start now and not years ago when this became a problem. What constitutes a social media company? How will the government decide to regulate what is “controversial”. This law seems strange with a lot of gaping holes.