Yeah. I just assumed OP mistyped during their rage. Otherwise, if google somehow found a way that would require people to refund THEM to cancel a subscription… that is pure evil but it is amazing design.
Although, I guess anything short of mind reading and changing the terms of service to match whoever subscribes is the way to go.
…
So you subscribed, found out it was not something you could use, and got a refund?
Isn’t that good design?
Advertising one thing, and then bait and switching it is in fact not a good design
I’d think good design would be usable, but maybe that’s just me.
Expectations from an era gone by.
…
No
It says he sent a refund, not that he received one.
Yeah. I just assumed OP mistyped during their rage. Otherwise, if google somehow found a way that would require people to refund THEM to cancel a subscription… that is pure evil but it is amazing design.
Although, I guess anything short of mind reading and changing the terms of service to match whoever subscribes is the way to go.