“I call on Chancellor Javier Reyes and the University of Massachusetts administration to denounce the Canary Mission and publicly state its defense of student activists who are doxxed on the website,” writes Owen Ray.
Speech is being discouraged and student’s futures threatened
As of January 2019, the site had profiles of 1,853 individuals and 563 professors. Canary Mission targets Arab and Muslim students and faculty in particular. Blacklisted individuals have reported being questioned by employers, graduate schools, and the FBI about their support for Palestinian rights after Canary Mission reached out. They have been put on leave, been denied bank accounts, and received death threats.
The FBI did question some people on that website, but not necessarily because of that website. For example, they questioned one person on that website because of his Facebook post:
We are all RESISTANCE ! We are all #hamas !
Note to FBI: views expressed in quotations do not necessarily reflect those of FlowVoid, its subsidiaries, or its employees
This isn’t cancel culture:
I admit that being questioned by the FBI and denied bank accounts is pretty unusual, but the rest of that sounds like normal cancel culture.
Cancel culture is boycotting for accountability, this is blacklisting.
I think it’s accountability when you agree with the boycott and blacklisting when you don’t.
Individuals can’t blacklist, only organizations and institutions. Individuals boycott.
The FBI did question some people on that website, but not necessarily because of that website. For example, they questioned one person on that website because of his Facebook post:
Note to FBI: views expressed in quotations do not necessarily reflect those of FlowVoid, its subsidiaries, or its employees
Source?
Edit: I genuinely would like a source.
https://theintercept.com/2018/06/24/students-for-justice-in-palestine-fbi-sjp/
Thanks.
Hah, that’s a little more spicy than the standard “Israel made Hamas do it”.