Who’d have thought BoredApe NFTs would be such an actual eyesore?

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    But they didn’t buy pictures… They bought receipts with URLs that direct to copies of pictures that they have no actionable rights on.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny how many people think an nft is owning the image, but you don’t even have that. You have a link to an image.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s literally not even that. You don’t own that link. There’s a notice on a public board that has both the link “This is the property of [yourname]”.

        • Subverb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          NFTs are like those late-night commercials for star naming “registries”. They have their own Access database of non-legally-binding names that people have given to stars. You can pay to be on the list and get a paper certificate that no one gives a shit about.

          By the way there are (estimates vary) thousands of stars in the observable universe for every grain on earth, just as there are essentially infinite NFTs.

    • fedditurus_est@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not true. At least in the case of BAYC the terms of use even give you a commercial license: iii. Commercial Use. Subject to your continued compliance with these Terms, Yuga Labs LLC grants you an unlimited, worldwide license to use, copy, and display the purchased Art for the purpose of creating derivative works based upon the Art (“Commercial Use”).