• cosmic_slate@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Huge doubt. Mastodon only has 1.6 million active people source, it’s practically a rounding error compared to all of Meta’s properties.

    Threads had ~65x as many people sign up in a month, and even though many dropped off, Threads is on track (as of Sept) to reach 23.7 million users. source.

    The fediverse is certainly a thing that needs to grow but I think it’s real-world impact right now is greatly exaggerated.

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wow 23.7 million active users seems surprisingly high compared to Twitter’s projected 56.1.

      Yeah the fediverse’s real-world impact is definitely miniscule currently, but I can’t seem to trust even a tiny bit in Meta to not pull the EEE plug. I understand your opinion tho.

      • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I was surprised so many people still use Twitter.

        I just figure if Threads federates, it means one less reason for people to say “well Mastodon has nobody on it” because they can just add people on Threads. I think more people would leave Threads for Mastodon than Mastodon for Threads.

        • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s in the source:

          Instagram’s Threads is forecast to have 23.7 million monthly active users in the US by the end of this year as opposed to X’s 56.1 million, according to Insider Intelligence.