SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 9 months agoJustifying one thing because it's a necessary component of another unnecessary thing... what logical fallacy is that?message-squaremessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down13
arrow-up144arrow-down1message-squareJustifying one thing because it's a necessary component of another unnecessary thing... what logical fallacy is that?SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square124fedilink
minus-squareSeahorseTreble@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoAre you now trying to claim that animals don’t have cognition despite the fact they’re sentient and intelligent beings?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoi’m saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i’d love to read it.
Are you now trying to claim that animals don’t have cognition despite the fact they’re sentient and intelligent beings?
i’m saying they are not cognizant of their personal mortality. if you can get me a cognitive-behavior paper that undercuts this, i’d love to read it.