Appimages, snaps and flatpaks, which one do you prefer and why?

      • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        aur is limited to arch based distros only

        And rpms are for redhat tree, so ?

        OP said

        None of the above. Native debs/rpms/whatever for desktops, docker images for servers.

        Your example package is readily available in my distro in native was my point. If your distro doesn’t have it then maybe you need to change distros.

        • Archimede@fediverse.boo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Arch users being like “I have it in my AUR. What more could other people ask for ?”

          You should realise it’s a possibility not to want to change a system just to use (possibly broken) AUR

          • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which, again, misses the point. Original OP said “install native” replying OP said “but what about (package)” (obviously intending that to be a gotcha) and I replied with “well it’s in mine”

            I have no idea what debs& rpms are available, nor do i care.

            And what is this “possibly broken aur” rubbish ? It’s a repository, and it most certainly isn’t broken.

            Individual packages may be broken but they can be broken in any repository. Are you saying there’s never been a broken package in a debian repository ? Lol.

            Edit to correct “you” to “OP” as you aren’t the original person doing the “whataboutism”

        • constantokra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you check packages you install from the aur? I ask, because it seems like people don’t. I did, and it was a pain in the ass, and that’s why I stopped using arch and arch based distros.

      • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nope, nothing broke but

        Aborting… error: failed to build ‘tuba-0.4.0-0.1’:

        and I can’t be arsed troubleshooting why for a package I have no intention of using. LOL

        • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically this. Not saying the “AUR breaking your system” thing isn’t, well, a thing but I get “error aborting installation” warnings waaaaay more often than my system just outright dying because of an AUR package (which is to say, it’s never actually happened to me).

          And usually, when I see that warning, I go “kay, not even gonna bother” because if I ignore it and try to brute force the install…yeah, that potential breakage is on me, not the AUR

          • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ditto. I’ve literally never had an aur package break my system either, but like you if it doesnt want to play first go, I’ll almost always find an alternative.