• HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          But what should they specifically do in this case to improve the situation - got any actual suggestions?

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, I don’t have any suggestion for how should Apple circumvent laws. But if they can’t improve on it, they shouldn’t lie that they did so.

          • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            they can push a new TOS to the app store mandating that push nitifs be handled the same way signal handles them.

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Signal sends notifications via Apple’s push notification servers. So I’m still not quite clear what are suggesting. That apps run continuously in the background. each doing real-time polling of their respective servers for notifications? Because your battery ain’t going to last long.

              • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                the way signal and some privacy friendly apps do it is they send a blank notif first to wake up the app and then send the notif directly to you

                • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That sounds like a cracking idea, the suggestion is that something in Apple’s ToS prevents this generally - but is that the case, if Signal manages it?