• sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    have inbuilt adblockers that aren’t extensions

    yeah but they are way less powerful than uBlock Origin. I tried Brave, just out of curiosity, and shields is a crippled uBO.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Try uBO Lite, which is official and MV3. It is very much good enough, it’s just the edges and user-defined filters that aren’t covered. Adblocking possibilities in MV3 have improved a lot, though they obviously still aren’t par and could probably never be par with MV2

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        user-defined filters

        that’s what makes uBO better than any other adblocker. I’m not surprised Google wanted to get rid of it.

        I’ll stick to Firefox based browsers.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty sure ABP also had user-defined filters… I strongly disagree that user defined filters out of all things that makes uBO better. It’s the dedicated filter team, the advanced filter syntax, the memory consumption, the uWall integration…