I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I’d rather hear about things that are actually happening.

  • jackpot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    has propaganda elections ≠ has legitimate elections. it’s literally a one-party state genuinely cop on.

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        nope, usa is a two party first the past post system on a federal level and allows state levels to determine their own systems, both of which allows for third parties. you have no actual proof of voter fraud and jim crow era laws have been long dismantled. fuck off with that. yes, gerrymandering exists on a state level but that isnt a federal issue. your problem exists with specific states, regardless, a challenger can still win a gerrymandered state. now go prove china has a democracy on a federal level, you cant

        • mayooooo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol ok, I mean you have the ultra right and the right party. They are different, but the usa has a well defined external politic which doesn’t really change. So since I’m outside to me it looks almost like china

          • jackpot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            outside policy that doesnt change? literally every president has different external policy which is regulated by 100 changing members of the senate. what the fuck are you talking about.

          • jackpot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            literally the first line: ‘The People’s Republic of China is a one-party state ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).’ cope harder commie

              • jackpot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                ‘…eight minor political parties subservient to the CCP exist.’ you were saying?

                  • jackpot@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    oh? two major parties? wow so theres a choice? and can we nominate who gets to lead those parties? oh yes we bloody can lmfao.

        • reksas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          to me, usa seems so politically inflamed it might as well be 2 “one partys” fighting each other.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’re a dictatorship/have no elections ≠ they aren’t a dictatorship, and they do have elections, but I, as a foreigner who’s been raised on a constant diet of anti China sentiments, don’t consider them ‘legitimate.’

      I don’t consider the elections of most western countries legitimate, but I still wouldn’t call their leaders dictators

        • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, they have elections.

          Lol, China’s leaders do change. Maybe you should have done any research before just believing the lie you’ve been told often enough.

          and none of the east’s

          Are ok, you’re just a racist.

            • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              chinas leader change when they die

              I am once again asking you to do even a shred of research before wading into this discussion.

              • bermuda@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                It would help prevent a lot of useless bickering if you could provide sources for your own claims instead of begging others to do the work for you.

                • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Anyone who can’t verify for themselves that changes in Chinese leadership aren’t the result of the old one dying is nakedly talking in bad faith and just trying to waste my time. This is not the sort of thing you need to find academic papers for.

                  Note also that he was the one making the claim, maybe ask him for his source.