• cobra89@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will kindly ask you to retract that insult.

    I’ll retract that “insult” when you explain why you’re still defending apple after several people have responded to you with objective information that this is not a patent trolling case and that Massimo was using the technology but you’re still defending Apple while having no counter-argument to the fact that it’s clearly not a patent trolling situation.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is not a vote, these are facts you can check yourself:

      • Between 2006 and 2022: Massimo kept building a portfolio of “provisional filings”, without filing a final version that would get published
      • 2022: Massimo launches its own watch, still without having filed for final patents
      • later in 2022: Apple announces a watch with similar functionality
      • shortly after Apple’s announcement: suddenly Massimo decides to file final versions of a slew of patents it had kept in the “provisional” stage for 15+ years

      There is no counter-argument.