• vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    developing countries don’t have enough infrastructure to benefit from wealth

    It’s even worse: they only have the infrastructure to allow us to profit from their wealth. Colonial powers made sure the railroad between the mines and the ports are top notch, so their mineral riches can be carted off efficiently to the metropole.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      China and other advanced nations prove that an export based economy can work though.

      I will say that export driven economies are very difficult though. See Taiwan and their export of chips. It only works because Taiwan is basically modern Vulkans / Wizards who have chip technology that no one else in the world has.

      A system of top level universities to build that kind of knowledge and infrastructure is difficult and outside the reach of most countries.

      • beatle@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        The machines are Dutch and the designs are made by the customer. The Taiwanese advantage is their government subsidised chip manufacturing. They aren’t wizards.

    • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can see this in painful clarity watching the Argentinian railroads. Created and operated by the UK originally, it has a clear shape of a funnel from all over the country towards the main port city, Buenos Aires.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s a general pattern though - sea transport is the most efficient, thus railroads will tend to integrate around important ports. It applies even in the UK.