For consistency sake, let’s say that any game that’s >or=7/10 at what it’s trying to do while having a popular perception of being a <5/10 game in general would count. Want to specify that this is more about the perception of the game compared to, say, a game just being really niche.

My personal Go-to for this would probably be the Callisto Protocol, because while it certainly did have some troubles at launch they were massively overblown. IMO most of the hate for it comes down to people expecting it to be Dead Space 4 with a new name, ignoring the devs the multitude of times they said that it’s something else before release, and then getting mad when it released and wasn’t dead space 4 under a new name.

  • Thembo McBembo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely No Man’s Sky

    It was bad at launch, sure, but the expectations of the game were way outta proportion to what a game could deliver on

    • Navarian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem I had with no man’s sky is that a large amount of the out of proportion expectations were a direct result of the developers over promising, rather than consumers just being over hyped.