• r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anecdotal evidence, but I swapped out Google for DDG about 5-6 years back and haven’t missed it. I do use Google sometimes but it’s once in 4-5 months when DDG fails me, which is acceptable to me.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      DDG just kinda sucks for basic information. When I took up a business, google gives me the location, phone number and some relevant information about the business. DDG gives me their website.

        • S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, one option provides it immediately the other requires you to perform additional steps.

          Guess which one’s going to be more popular amongst the general public? You’re not this obtuse are you?

    • Nom Nom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same here, I can usually find everything within the first 3-4 entries unless it’s a bit too abstract than it ends up at the bottom of the 1st page. I don’t understand people complaining about it so much as I depend on search engines for day to day and work related stuff so literally several times everyday. Although it’s possible I got used to how it works but if so then I would have had to swap between ddg and google alot if the quality actually was that low.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah I’m the same. I’ve got DDG set as my default search, if the results aren’t useful then I go to google as backup.