Enhanced Performance: DNF5 promises faster repository metadata processing and improved package query operations, aiming to save users precious seconds during package management tasks.

Reduced System Footprint: By eliminating Python dependencies and merging the functionalities of DNF and MicroDNF, DNF5 offers a significantly smaller installation size, reducing metadata redundancy.

Unified Experience: Fedora aims to provide a consistent package management experience across all platforms, with DNF5 serving as the sole package manager for servers, workstations, and containers.

  • somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve been using dnf5 for a few weeks now. I never want to go back. If you use fedora, seriously consider checking it out. The only thing I’m missing is the provides subcommand.

    • TFO Winder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I hate dnf downloading 100 mb of meta data before I can install a package.

      I had worked with Pacman and it was just so good with repos.

      Does it feel better?

    • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Did you run into any issue? Is it stable enough? I’ve never got the guts to install it on my main desktop.

      • somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I haven’t yet! Today I did a kernel update with it, I was kind of hoping something would go wrong so I would have a bug to report. But nope. Everything worked flawlessly. I’m not really sure how to break it but I’m going to try (in a vm lol)

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is it just because it’s faster? Feels like I can wait a couple of months for that?