Please understand that I haven’t tried or installed Arch Linux yet. From what I understand by reading and watching related videos, Arch is often breaks and a lot of time is required to fix issues. But I have also read comments from arch users who claim that arch has only crashed or caused them problems only a couple of times in a year.

Wouldn’t a stable or non rolling release distro be a great choice for the Steam Deck?? Also, how frequently do the packages get updated on steam os?

  • halfwaythere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please explain this to me. It is stable till it’s not? What happens during that time that makes arch no longer stable?

    • papafoss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you go a long time without updating there are generally lots of updates. So when you update sometimes you can have dependency issues. Basic maintenance prevents this.

      Personally I never have this issue and generally don’t have any issues with Arch. Truly have no idea why people think it’s unstable. Maybe bad experiences with Manjaro which is Arch based. Now that distro has stability issues! Garuda and vanilla arch have been rock solid as far as my experience goes.

      • halfwaythere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have a project that I may have to go donw this route. Haven’t touched Arch in many years so I’d figure it be more “stable”. Didn’t know if there were inherent issues. Doesn’t sound like there is just basic maintenance. Thanks for explaining.