Whether you’re really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    8·
    7 months ago

    Because SecOps still thinks NAT is security, and NetOps is decidedly against carrying around that stupid tradition.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      7 months ago

      You can even Nat still if you want too lol

      That said have you looked at securing ipv6 networks?It can be a lot of new paridgms that need to be secured.