• ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We have every right to be pissed off. I followed every rule you’re supposed to follow. And I’m still worried about retiring in the future. The system is fucking stupid. At my job, every system I implement or touch can be changed. Change is a part of life. But for some fucking reason, this country can’t change shit. We just sit in it as everything gets worse while everyone who is struggling continues to struggle even more. The rich get richer. America blows.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      We just sit in it as everything gets worse

      Democrats make things better. Vote more democrats in, more things get more better.

      For example, under Biden, the wealth gap between the poorest and the richest is now closing for the first time in almost 100 years. Yes, that’s cold comfort to the middle class, but it shouldn’t be. It’s the start of a trend and we need to see it through.

        • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve voted in every local and national election as soon as I turned 18. Protested in George Floyd protests. I’m 30 now. Shit takes way too long.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Protesting is for you to feel good. Unless you’re protesting for civil rights and being arrested for breaking an unjust law.

            If you want to influence the process, you should volunteer for a candidate’s campaign and forget protests. Sorry, but it’s the truth.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              While I generally agree with you, protesting has a place. Protesting alone is useless, but protests in concert with working for concrete policy changes is a force multiplier.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    fuck that older generation divide to conquer shit.

    the ruling class failed us, not our parents generation.

  • moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Another one of those frustrating segments where they come so close to being right but miss the point entirely by the end. The diagnosis of the issues young people face is on point, but the answer to most of the problems mentioned is not civics courses. It’s redistribution of wealth and providing access to housing and social mobility to young people.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      but the answer to most of the problems mentioned is not civics courses

      Civics courses are necessary precursors. A lot of youthful idiots think Biden has a big “cancel student loans” button on his bedside table and just chooses not to push it because lmao fuck those guys, make em pay

      You can’t pursue solutions if you don’t know how.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s easy to demand things, it’s hard to accept mutual responsibility and contribute. It’s the difference between demanding mutual aid, and actually showing up

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are 38 US companies whose gross yearly revenue is over $100 billion. The collective amount OVER $100 billion is about the same as the US federal budget. No company should make more than $100 billion in revenue - it’s a monopolistic action. Tax all corporate revenue over $100 billion. How much is a variable amount based upon federal deficit spending. If the US government overspends $1 trillion then that amount is paid by these too large corporations. That way US politicians are disincentivized to over spend as the largest corporations will lobby strongly to have a balanced budget. If all US companies downsize or split off to reduce revenue to <$100 billion? Awesome, then we have no monopolies and their lobbying powers are therefore greatly diminished.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Revenue is not profit. Costs haven’t been taken out yet. This is part of the structural unfairness of personal income tax vs corporate income tax. Companies can write off everything they need to earn money (rent, supplies, wages, utilities) but people can’t.

        How many companies have $100 million in profit, or more? It’s just one: Apple.

        https://www.financecharts.com/screener/most-profitable-country-us

        They’re already under investigation for monopoly practices:

        https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/21/technology/apple-doj-lawsuit-antitrust.html

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Businesses can’t deduct those asset purchases as costs (they are not “expenses”). They have to depreciate them over a set number of years, according to established accounting practices.

            Purchases of long-term business assets, such as factories and equipment, are claimed as depreciation. This involves subtracting a percentage of their cost per tax return over a period of years.

            https://www.thebalancemoney.com/expense-or-depreciate-items-on-your-taxes-392950

            This is fine and actually correct, because equipment and buildings literally cost money every year to repair or replace parts.

            There are enough things to be angry about without making anything up. Please educate yourself about what businesses actually do, so you can advocate correctly. Otherwise you just sound dumb.

  • ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And rightly so, for they have been failed. You can’t even GO TO SCHOOL without concern that you’ll be killed in a mass shooting. This was never a concern for my generation. In 1992, when I graduated, the thought that going to school could be an extinction event for you was not even conceivable. This shouldn’t be an ongoing concern for any generation, yet here we are, sending our kids off to school every morning, knowing that there’s a slim chance they might not come back.

    It’s driving me crazy. But when the whole world’s gone mad, how can you be sure you’re insane?

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I graduated in 1997, in a rural town, and I can say that we’ve knives that caused some injuries and scares and while we did have a kid that brought his dad’s handgun to school and threatened people with it, didn’t shoot anyone thankfully. This type of shit was around even in the 90’s just not around the world and in the 24 hour news like it is now, remember we had Columbine just a few years after we graduated in 1999.

      This shit’s been bad for a while now.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not young, but I feel the same way as these young people. I don’t care about this country, I don’t care about its people, and I don’t care about its future. It’s like that Bob Dylan song, “I used to care, but things have changed.”

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I care about its people. I always care about people. Just some people need to be rescued from their hate filled delusion. It’s sad to see these poor suckers get tricked into being angry about things that have absolutely nothing to do with them. Talking about conservative media and how all it does is lash out against things. I don’t even think there is ryhme or reason to it. It is as if they offer up a topic and open the floor to anyone who has some minor complaint.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      GLYY18qWwAAb7pj

      Each successive generation has a higher income even accounting for inflation

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of the average US home was $11,000.00

        How many minimum wage workers are out there right now looking to buy a new home?

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So, you agree, people were able to buy a house on minimum wage in the past and can’t do that today?

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re deliberately ignoring what I actually wrote. Two high school grads working minimum wage jobs in 1960 could have been homeowners in about five years. There are hundreds of reasons why the ownership rate was lower in the past.

          • webadict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Repeat same talking point.

            The things you say are useless, especially since these are adjusted by household size. Do one that isn’t.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Repeat same talking point.

              I’m not saying I agree with them, but they are the only ones providing actual data. Everyone else, including you, is just attacking and downvoting them. I would be interested in hearing an actual argument, but to accuse them of just “repeating a talking point” while they provide data and you provide nothing but a talking point is ridiculously hypocritical.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Their data is adjusted for family size. Family size has been consistently shrinking since the 1960s, which, if you adjust their graph, will lead to overall decrease in wages throughout time. It is a meaningless method of transformation to get data that supports a false narrative.

                Why did you not point out that their data is transformed when I did?

      • yuri@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And people can’t afford houses, college, healthcare, etc. because…? Like cool chart, but my generation will literally never be as financially stable as those who came before. I guess it’s fun to pretend we’re better off than we are though.

        Imagine paying for college with your income rather than loans.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          People can afford more things now than the previous generation

          There are things that increased in price faster, like college. But that’s offset by other things that didn’t increase as fast, like fuel. There are other things that got cheaper, like computers and phones. You’re cherry picking the things that got more expensive, but those are not 100% of a person’s expenses

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s fun that tvs and computers got cheaper, but housing and food are through the roof.

            It’s cool that I can buy a laptop for 500$ dollars, but it’s a one time purchase that we can live without.

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah and look 2 years back on your same graph and see the big 11% in one month.

                And let’s not forget that this is multiplicative. So these months/years with high inflation are still felt today even if the inflation is relatively normal.

                But you are disingenuous in your arguments, while accusing others of doing that same thing.

                So kindly fuck off

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s in line with the inflation numbers. Food costs did not outpace inflation in any significant way

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Professional certifications don’t transfer outside specific countries, and her profession is also very language-oriented so she would have to be absolutely fluent in the language of whatever country we went to. That basically leaves England, New Zealand, or Australia as the only options, and only if she decided to spend months and months doing nothing but studying to pass the boards.

        Once we are getting closer to retirement, though, then we will start looking.