• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Which then raises the question: why isn’t the US using open source software everywhere, paying the same -or very likely - much less to maintain and expand said software? Can you imagine the money stream towards thousands of devs fixing any (but, feature or security) issue, which they would already do for free? Finally some recognition and so on.

    Finally they’d have software that they can trust and rely upon, it’ll kill one huge company and spawn hundreds of smaller companies. Win-win all around

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because there is seldom a good replacement for the majority of software that enterprises use.

      • s1nistr4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        As much as I like FOSS it’s significantly harder to fund.

        With proprietary you keep the source code, ship the app, collect data & sell it, and charge for a premium /subscription. They then use that money to fund talented devs and give them deadlines to make good software.

        With FOSS it’s largely contribution work by people who work on it in their free time. They use donations or paying for enterprise support, and if they do add a subscription service / premium version you can just modify the code and get it for free.

        That’s largely why FOSS software is behind, what’s the direct incentive for someone to make it good?