• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Where in my comment do I even mention interest rates? At any rate, you’re not wrong that they’re supposed to curb inflation but they haven’t. You’re own source says-

    Leila Bengali decomposes inflation into interest-rate responsive and unresponsive categories. (whether each inflation category has historically declined >after a surprise interest rate hike)

    Current excess inflation is entirely due to the unresponsive categories.

    That’s that flat red section. It’s unresponsive to the rate change. You can see the blue section responded even before the FED actually made the change. That’s when the FED made statements about raising the rate. So we can see that the responsive section was very responsive. But the unresponsive section is keeping rates from properly coming down.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      When the Fed makes statements, banks already respond because it affects the curve. If you expect higher rates in the future, you wouldn’t accept longer duration bonds right now for the current smaller rate.

      So a statement that rates will be increased actually moves them for anything other than the current over night rates

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, that’s the blue section. The Red section it turns out is the housing sector, that DGAF because they’re heavily coordinating prices and there’s no cheaper alternative.