• InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe some gun nut can help me with this. If the teen had, say an AR15 because he was concerned about running into some wild hogs. If he ducked down and started firing back in a clearly self defense situation, would he fine in doing this?

    Or does it depend on the color of his skin?

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nevermind the racial part.

      Your scenario actually highlights a good point, what kind of society do we want to live in? Some western everyone for them selves, shoot first talk later, or do we want to live in a civilized society?

      My belief is that guns in general make us less safe. Both of the individuals in this story would be safer if neither had any guns. As well as the entire neighborhood, would also be safer without guns.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nevermind the racial part.

        Yeah I don’t think I will… This isn’t happening in a vacuum.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There theoretically could be a situation where two people shoot at each other and both can claim self-defense, but it would be convoluted.

      Self defense does not apply if a person legally provokes the attacker. Now legal provocation means committing a crime, not telling a yo mama joke. As an example, if I try to rob a bank and someone starts shooting at me, I can’t claim self defense because I provoked them by robbing a bank.

      So in this case, depends on if the trespassing is a crime that would count as legal provocation. If not, delivery guy is allowed to return fire. And I hope every sane person agrees it is not a provocation or a crime.

      Edit: So in this case, the only provocation could be trespassing, if parking in some ones driveway counted. Which it almost certainly does not as explained in replies to this comment. In addition, I am not sure trespassing would qualify as provocation, this may depend on state laws and the details of the trespass.

      Edit 2: Just to make it even clearer, the answer is yes. I believe the delivery driver could legally return fire, but I am not a lawyer.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This would not be criminal trespassing though. They would have to have been told to leave then, given an appropriate amount of time to leave, they refuse to do so, you now have a criminal trespass. Just pulling into someone’s driveway isn’t gonna cut it. Everyone has the legal right to enter your open property for the purpose of contacting you.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If that asshole didn’t wanted anyone in his driveway he should have a good fence with a door, not an open one. As it has it (and with his trigger happy response) it’s not s driveway but a honeypot.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah people like him, even if they somehow haven’t really broke the law, need to be labeled as dangerous to society. Like, shooting someone for pulling in your driveway? That is insanity. This person is definitely not stable enough to just be loose in society.