Electric leaf blowers are already far quieter than their gas-powered peers, but they still aren’t the kind of thing you’d like to hear first-thing on a Saturday morning. Looking to impr…
  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1019·
    6 months ago

    So they could provide the testing data to prove it. Even the numbers, don’t need a full detailed video.

    The lack of proof to their claims is concerning.

    They’ve made a claim they should have known would need to be verified, eventually…… its bush league for that on its own.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1014·
        6 months ago

        I thought having a conversation about the validity of their claims would be an okay thing to do in this community?

        Or are you saying this place is for something else?

        • protist@mander.xyzEnglish
          286·
          6 months ago

          You demanding more evidence right now and saying these students’ project “is concerning” is not having a conversation about the validity of their claims, it’s just being petulant. Saying, “I’ll be interested to see the specs” or “I’ll keep an eye out for testing data before I believe this” would convey the same thing without coming off like an asshole

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldEnglish
            823·
            6 months ago

            It’s data they should have had to begin with, they made the claim. Of course it’s going to be questioned, they could have been upfront with the data.

            What other reason would they omit it? Other than to mislead if it wasn’t actually 100%.

            It’s funny how I am “demanding” something that would be just basic decency to include along with their claim, they provided the data for the sound after all……