• Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not with half of the country supporting whackadoo oligarchists, we can’t.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            The first-past-the-post system created the two-party system. In order to fix the two-party problem, a start would be ranked-choice voting. Otherwise voting third party is literally dangerous because the worst people might get into office and fuck things up more.

              • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Personally I’m more of a fan of Approval Voting since it’s effective and the easiest to explain/implement.

                Otherwise STAR voting is really good. Lastly I would take RCV since that is at least better than what we currently have.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      People just use the word capitalism to refer to any economic practice they don’t like.

      No, detaining someone on a ship until they pay you is not capitalism. Capitalism is based on free markets. Being imprisoned on a ship isn’t a free market.

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is however, a practice that results from the government being effectively corporate controlled. Which is the end result of allowing your free markets to run wild and allowing corporations to acquire that much power, money, and influence.

        A pure capitalist system actively selects for this kind of bullshit. The most ruthless and unethical companies end up winning in the end. And those same companies are buying our politicians.

        People blame capitalism when the system clearly favours the rich over the poor to such a dystopian extent that a man is allowed to be held hostage by a corporation

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes. Free markets eventually degrade into centrally-planned systems.

          That does not mean that centrally-planned systems are an aspect of capitalism, any more than a pile of decaying bones is an aspect of a family pet.

          Free markets degrade over time. That does not invalidate their utility; it just means they are like all other phenomena in being temporary.

          • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            centrally-planned systems are an aspect of capitalism

            Isn’t that the end goal of capitalism? Winning is having control of all the capital right? How can you divorce the implied, if not explicit, end goal of a system from the system itself?

            pile of decaying bones is an aspect of a family pet.

            How is this not an aspect? It’s the inevitable end of any living thing, much like capitalism and the heartless exploitation of literally everything