• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    this seems illegal.

    Assuming somebody other than google owns the phone (The individual, the carrier.) that now becomes theft.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t think it is because TOS. It would become illegal if they insinuate otherwise (such as stating they will send back your phone once they’re done such as in advertising.)

      Edit: oh right warranty restrictions/regulations never mind.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you really not send your phone off for repair without the expectation that it’s returned when the repairs are complete?

        Refusing to service modified hardware is one thing. Keeping the device is theft, and no ToS has the power to change that.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Reminds me a bit of ASUS’ current bold strategy to hold customers ransom over their graphics cards through pressure and deception.

          Sounds pretty unenforceable to me.

          • bluGill@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Magnuson-Moss comes to mind. non oem parts cannot be used to deny warranty coveragi

          • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The same ones preventing me from opening “Joe Bob’s Pet Grooming and Laptop Repair Emporium” and then stipulating on the 3rd page of the TOS that I get to take ownership of anything that arrives on a Thursday.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This behavior isn’t unique to Google either; Samsung and Apple also engage in similar anti-consumer conduct. For example, in the report about Samsung mentioned earlier, it was found that Samsung requires independent repair stores to disassemble a customer’s product if it has a non-OEM part.

    wat

    Give me a break OEMs wtf

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is one of the many reasons why I advise people never to buy anything directly from Google and always go through a retailer. You basically have zero recourse with Google. If a retailer screws you over you can at least charge back as a last resort but Google has your account hostage. What can you do if they just decide to pull some bullshit like this?

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I can’t see anyone using non-OEM parts sending their device back to Google, they’ll just use their shady local fix it shop.