On P2P payments from their FAQ: “While the payment appears to be directly between wallets, technically the operation is intermediated by the payment service provider which will typically be legally required to identify the recipient of the funds before allowing the transaction to complete.

How about, no? How about me paying €50 to my friend for fixing my bike doesn’t need to be intermediated, KYCed, and blocked if they don’t approve of it or know who the recipient is? How about it’s none of the government’s business how I split the bill at dinner with friends? This level of surveillance is madness, especially coming from an app that touts “privacy” as a feature.

GNU Taler is a trojan horse to enable CBDC adoption. They are the friendly face to an absolutely terrifying level of government control in our lives funded by the same government that tries every year to implement chat control. Imagine your least favourite political party gaining power. Now imagine they can see and control every transaction you make. No thanks.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sure, it’s worse than monero and cash in terms of privacy, but that’s not what it’s supposed to replace. There are plans to use Taler as an alternative to card payments in the EU and that would be a great improvement. Currently all payment data is visible to multiple of companies, the shop, the bank, and many middle man and is often sold off to other commerical entities. Taler would stop that.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    GNU Taler is not your enemy. It may not solve every problem you’d like it to, but its adoption by the masses would be a vast improvement in privacy compared to the current state of commerce in every country where it has the slightest chance of happening any time soon.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not any closer than already existing commercial cashless payment solutions (which are much, much worse for privacy).

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The suggestions like this also scare me in that it might require you to carry a smartphone all the time for things as basic as payment.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is totally unrelated to GNU Taler though, and if it comes to that you will be happy to have GNU Taler as an privacy preserving option.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            When it comes to in-person payment, would Taler be usable without a mobile device? Say, with just a card like normal banking? I would have it much rather coexist with cash anyway.

            But yea, sounds like an improvement when it comes to online payments.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The person accepting the money needs online access, or at least some sort of way to receive a validation code. As for the buyer, I think currently there is no implementation of it, but according to my understanding of it it would be technically possible to load Taler tokens on a card chip and use them from that.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I disagree. Taler also individuals to stay private while preventing crime. I personally could never use crypto as it empowers criminals and is very unpredictable. Taler uses flat currency so you don’t need to worry about it losing value overnight.

    It isn’t done yet and it may get abandoned but it is a start. For now it is a interesting project to watch. Also cash is king

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Criminality is unfortunately a very subjective term. Data brokers are not criminals, neither corrupt politicians, but you can easily become one by not doing any harm, but going on a protest, or standing up to bad things imposed on you or other people.

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Taler can be used for custom currencies too. Anyone can run a mint for their own currency, and anyone can participate in handing out coins of a given currency, problem probably in exchange for things outside of the system. The reporting capability of Taler is tied to the currency.

          We will probably see it if it can really be done, but I think “traditional” cryptocurrencies could be implemented on top of taler.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You could use Crypto with Taler but it wouldn’t make a lot of sense as crypto is digital anyway. It also would have all the draw backs of crypto.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Taler uses flat currency so you don’t need to worry about it losing value overnight.

      There are a number of stabletokens that you also wouldn’t need to worry about losing value overnight.

      • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Stablecoins are the worst of crypto and central banking combined.

        • They are centralized, even more centralized than central banks since they are run by a single company not an board appointed by an elected government
        • They can rug you at any time
        • They only have value because they are “pegged” to a certain currency and the “backing” must exist to maintain that peg.
        • Their source of the backing is often “trust me bro”
        • Even if the backing was solid, market shocks and other problems can reduce the value of that backing, leading to them being insolvent and the stablecoin losing its value. And guess what, it wasn’t insured!
        • They are often poorly regulated or unregulated entirely, so you have no reason to trust their claims and probably can’t seek any real remedy if they are lies
        • They are, at best, pegging their value to a currency which is designed to lose 2-3% of its value per year due to inflation

        Several of them have already collapsed spectacularly. More will in time. Avoid stablecoins.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Some stablecoins are centralized, but it’s not a fundamental requirement of how they operate. Stabletokens such as DAI or Liquity are run without a central company. They cannot “rug” you because they’re based on smart contracts.

          They are often poorly regulated or unregulated entirely

          Isn’t that kind of the point?

          so you have no reason to trust their claims

          Smart contract code can be audited by anyone and trusted to run exactly as it’s written.

          They are, at best, pegging their value to a currency which is designed to lose 2-3% of its value per year due to inflation

          Stablecoins aren’t required to peg to any specific measure of value (I assume you’re referring to US dollars?). There are stabletokens pegged to gold, for example, if you really want something like that.

          Since US dollars work just fine for commerce, though, using a stabletoken that’s pegged to US dollars works fine for commerce too.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s just smoke and mirrors. If there was a “bank run” on a stable coin all of them would immediately collapse as there is nothing of real value backing them.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Anything of value is capable of losing its value under some circumstances, since value is assigned by humans. Obviously you pick and choose based on your use cases.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s a cop-out to avoid discussing that none of the stable coins have anywhere close to the assets they claim to have and which would be necessary to peg the value.

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You can examine the MakerDAO contract, for example, and see all of the assets they claim to have sitting right there under its control on the blockchain. You can see the contract logic behind how those assets enter and exit its control.