Sorry if this is slightly off topic, I searched for communities about tech support on here and couldn’t find anything that wasn’t dead in the water. Basically I want to use WPA3 on my Network, however my Windows partition doesn’t support WPA3 for some reason. I only keep that piece of trash around for school work. My Fedora Linux partition can use WPA3 just fine so I assume this is a driver issue. Is there any way to use Linux WiFi drivers on Windows?

(inb4 how the turntables)

  • Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Update the drivers on windows and see if the latest version supports it

    Or

    Install WSL or a VM and pass the device through to linux, let the kernel find it and activate the drivers, configure the network, then set up routes to share that connection with the host.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so ironic. Over the last few decades you could find millions of examples of the opposite question being asked.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like this is a weird place to put this. However, since you asked, why can’t you run Windows in a VM?

      • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you need to use windows because of a software issue, not a hardware issue, you’re probably best off running windows in a VM.
        That way your linux install is making the WPA3 connection, and as far as the Windows install is concerned, it’s on a wired lan.
        This has the added benefit of not having to reboot, you just always start linux and turn the windows VM on and off as required.

        • Wave@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Unfortunately its due to Lockdown browser which doesn’t allow virtualization no matter how obfuscated I try to make it.

            • Joël de Bruijn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I do see valid use cases for pc in a test-exam-facility (meaning 80 pc without personal login) or pc in kiosk mode.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Refuse to use it or if you aren’t that bold refuse to run it on your own hardware.

            Seriously though, it is documented malware

            • Wave@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I could do this if I wanted to get kicked out of college and lose 5k tuition

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Have you talked to your professor? You could always explain that the use of Lockdown browser is unjust. Also you can find professors that don’t require it.

          • f00f/eris@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have the same problem at my school, but thankfully, the school library has laptops I can borrow with the lockdown browser installed. It isn’t ideal, but is there a similar arrangement you could make?

            • Wave@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              They only allow certain students in specific programs to borrow and I dont fit the criteria. Its a Really shitty situation.

    • Wave@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Win 11, Something like Intel® Wireless-AC 6000. I dont remember if its 6258 or something like that, I just know its let’s than 9000 which is the minimum Intel requires for wpa3 for whatever reason. I can find the exact model # tomorrow if youre interested

  • f00f/eris@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unlikely. While in theory someone could create a compatibility layer, it would be quite a challenge, as obviously, kernel modules are very closely tied to the specific kernel. I did some web searches, and only found the same few dead projects (that didn’t completely solve this issue anyway) that you found, and other forum posts that offer little encouragement.

    Make sure you have the latest version of Windows 10 or 11, and the latest drivers for your network hardware. If you do, then there’s probably not much you can do about this.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it’s a case of needing ad-hoc WiFi from Windows, an Android phone tethered over USB will act as a WiFi adapter of sorts.

    • Wave@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure why you got down voted, this is what I’m currently doing to work around it

  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as the fanboys on here will try to argue Windows always has the latest drivers before Linux. So your windows install not supporting WPA3 while Fedora does has less to do with Windows being worse than Linux which in this case it objectively is not and more to do with you not keeping it up to date.