• Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Difference between open source software and closed source software:

    1. CrowdStrike bad coding make Linux crashes -> sysadmin has control over the system and can rapidly fix the issue by disabling CrowdStrike module -> downtime is limited

    2. CrowdStrike bad coding make Windows crashes -> sysadmin has limited control over the system and rely on Windows/CrowdStrike people to fix the issue -> the demand is too high cause the issue happened with many computers around the world at the same time -> huge downtime while few people on Microsoft and/or CrowdStrike fix the issue one by one manually

    • SquigglyEmpire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      …what?

      A busted kernel module/driver/plug-in/whatever that triggers a bootloop is going to require intervention on any platform no matter whether the code happens to be published somewhere out on the internet or not. On top of that, Windows allows you to control/remove 3rd party kernel drivers just like on Linux, which is exactly what many of us have been stuck doing on endless devices for the last three days.

      I fully advocate for open-source software and use it where I can, but I also think we should do that by talking about its actual advantages instead of just making up nonsense that will make experienced sysadmins spit out their coffee.

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sysadmin here. Wtf are you talking about? All we did was “rapidly fix the issue by disabling Crowdstrike module.” Or really, just the one bad file. We were back online before most people even woke up.

      What do you think Crowdstrike can do from their end to stop a boot loop?