• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Those are not necessarily the same people.

    But there is no good option here. The good option would have been to run a good candidate over a year ago. That time has obviously long since passed.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US “election cycle” is insane. You don’t need to be running a candidate over a year before the election. 3 months is more than enough time to tell people who your candidate is and what they are running on, and you have more than 3 months.

      Yes, it would have been better to announce earlier, but jesus christ he is too fucking old for this shit. Stepping back now is still better than pushing through.

      • Zoolander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bro, we start selling a Christmas decorations in July in the US. People need to be making money off this shit.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The longer the cycle is made, the more people can be distracted from the actual politics and the more it matters who gets the most money.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Especially with how calcified the voting population is. Each candidate has something like a 44% floor of people who already know they’re going to vote for “the Democratic candidate” and the only question is how many of them actually go to the polls and what the remaining randos decide. And only in a handful of swing states. Most of the system is already predetermined.