magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 4 months agoLOLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down112
arrow-up141arrow-down1imageLOLlemmy.worldmagnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squarealyth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-24 months ago or traditional Fedora, which also has often unstable packages, dnf is often unusable My experience with dnf is that it’s slow as molasses but your average computer user isn’t gonna install 10 new CLI apps per day /j I’ve used Discover (dnf or flatpack backend) and you can install just about any software with 1 click. It takes a minute to install but that’s fine.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoMy issue with dnf is the distro upgrade being completely broken. While on Fedora Atomic, Distro upgrades are just another rebase. It is so much simpler and just works.
My experience with dnf is that it’s slow as molasses but your average computer user isn’t gonna install 10 new CLI apps per day /j
I’ve used Discover (dnf or flatpack backend) and you can install just about any software with 1 click. It takes a minute to install but that’s fine.
My issue with dnf is the distro upgrade being completely broken.
While on Fedora Atomic, Distro upgrades are just another rebase. It is so much simpler and just works.