Basically, what the title says. Do you use any app, that is proprietary, but either has no OSS alternatives or they’re all not good enough? If there is an alternative, what keeps you from switching?

  • FuryMaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I went with FUTO Keyboard. It’s the only keyboard that ticks all my boxes to replace GBoard so far.

    I wish the swiping predictions were a bit better though.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does the futo keyboard allow you to paste content yet?

      I briefly used it but found the lack of content pasting too much of a hindrabce.

      • FuryMaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Has options for pasting, and even a clipboard history feature? Although have not enabled that or tested it.

      • Treeniks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is not. FUTO calls it “source first” which just means “open source but with rules against bad actors”. Certainly far from proprietary.

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If the license doesn’t meet the OSD and does not protect four freedoms, then it is not open-source.

            • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy.

              Calling a source-available license “not proprietary”, this is what not very healthy.

              “Source-first” or “fair code” are just a fancy ways to say “proprietary”.

        • compcube@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It is not open source, because it does not meet the definition of open source.