error: no server is specified. error: no suitable video mode found. /dev/sdc2: clean, 259918/15630336 files.

After this error screen for few seconds it automatically boots into Ubuntu.

Need Help :)

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    28·
    1 year ago

    Nothing to worry about especially if it boots fine and loads your graphical environment. It’s just a grub warning message because grub doesnt play well with (presumably) nvidia. You could probably make some tweaks to remove the error but there’s really no reason to bother.

  • Meatplay@feddit.de
    1·
    1 year ago

    I had this error several times (also cases where it would not boot afterwards). It usually appears after installing Nvidia drivers.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.de
    12·
    1 year ago

    According to DDG it’s a Grub issue. There are a couple of things you could try by searching that error message.

      • iloverocks@feddit.de
        2·
        1 year ago

        Ubuntu has gotten worse that it seams to was a few years ago. I didn’t use it outside of servers. Many don’t like the direction that ubuntu goes with snaps. But use whatever distro you want

        Welcome to the land of freedom

        • dm_me_your_boobs@lemm.ee
          0·
          1 year ago

          Oh right I forgot all about snaps. Yeah I haven’t used it as a dedicated desktop since probably 2006. It’s generally all server usage in the cloud for me these days, which basically means everything is disposable and I couldn’t care less about the full OS in general. I really do need to get back on Linux for personal use though. I don’t really care for running VMs on windows for my self hosted stuff.

          • Maestro@kbin.social
            1·
            1 year ago

            Why would anyone use Ubuntu on a server? Ubuntu is basically Debian unstable + non-free drivers that they tried to get sorta stable in 6 months. That may be ok on a desktop where you can accept some bugs in exchange for newer versions of the software. But why would you not run Debian stable on a server instead?

            Maybe 10 years ago when Debian stable got really out-of-date, but that hasn’t been true in a looong time. Debian releases much more frequently, much stabler, it has all the goid stuff from Ubuntu backported but none if the bad stuff.

        • Alex@discuss.online
          51·
          1 year ago

          They basically force you to use snaps, that’s why it’s not good.

          They also have ads in the package manager.

        • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
          31·
          1 year ago

          They have made quite a few questionable decisions over time and trying to push users into their own packaging format is a big no no for many. Yours is a very dumb take.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              41·
              1 year ago

              Can’t make a coherent counter-argument? Just call them and edgelord!

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                12·
                1 year ago

                Please let me know which brilliant argument your peer has made that so excited you. Is it the vague “questionable decisions”, the “big no no” or that “Yours is a very dumb take?”

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  21·
                  1 year ago

                  See the other replies that you’ve conveniently ignored for the meat of those decisions.

        • Laser@feddit.de
          1·
          1 year ago

          For me the question is rather, what’s the current raison d’être for Ubuntu if you’re not looking for Debian with paid support?

          Granted it’s been long since I’ve used it (I used it from 2005 or so until 2008 when I switched to Arch), but there’s no really appealing quality for me there that I couldn’t have with Debian. Apart from that, Canonical makes questionable decisions – snap, as others have mentioned, a total disaster in my opinion; Mir was another of their misadventures (later retrofitted into a Wayland compositor); upstart didn’t turn out successful (though to give credit, it was an honest attempt at a new init system and lessons were learned); the LXD maintainer issue as of late leaves a sore taste in my mouth, plus they were always very community-unfriendly with their CLAs. And all this for what? Might as well use their upstream instead.

          • Kayn@dormi.zoneEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            Ubuntu has the largest community around it, meaning you’ll find help for it the fastest.

            Granted, some issues are distro-agnostic, but you can’t always know whether yours is, especially if you are newer to Linux.

    • Ratz@chatsubo.hiteklolife.net
      2·
      1 year ago

      Apparently this was a controversial take

      When I first started learning how to Linux long ago everyone recommended Ubuntu… and I had a similar issue to the OP.

      I had to dump the EDID of my monitor from a Windows machine to actually get X to recognise any kind of monitor modes …it was an eye opening experience for a newbie.

      Today, I still dont really like it for other reasons (I’d take Debian over Ubuntu any day). Call me crazy here guys but I think its okay to share an opinion without being called an edgelord for it.

      (I use arch btw 🎩)

    • Nicbudd@beehaw.org
      1·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had a much easier time on Ubuntu with NVIDIA cards than with other distros. Also, I’m not sure how this is helpful advice to a new user at all.