• souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    My understanding is that the company would be regulated by CRA and not the developer. However, that does not stop the company from pushing the developer for CRA compliance.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s actually pretty reasonable. I’d be happy to make my open source projects compliant for a company - but they can damn well pay me for the effort.

        • Rogue@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Indeed, that’s why I use the AGPL license. Corporations hate it because it forces them to give back.

          • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            it's free as in go pound sand if you aren't going to fund maintainers

            it doesn’t force them to do anything until devs refuse to work for any company that doesn’t.

            i’m with you on agplv3+. The copyright recognition document comes before the resume.

        • phase@lemmy.8th.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Well, if I understand things correctly, it may address a part of this issue indirectly: corps are responsible of what they use. If a part is open source they also have the opportunity to fix the problem themselves.

          Looks very nice to me.

    • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Wait? Are we pretending the corps are actually the FOSS devs?

      A Corp dev, aka a FOSS dev forced into societal job creation servitude making throw away smartphone apps, web sites, and now AI models.

      Gets paid to not be a productive person. Is essential what a societal job creation program is. Actually accomplishing anything is a random flaw and not the intent of employing devs.

      The alternative would be to fund the dev to concentrate on maintenance efforts of their repos which the entire world depends on.

      And if you don’t believe me, just explain one thing. What’s the pip-tools maintainer up to? Cuz it’s definitely not focused on pip-tools maintenance

      Would definitely be interested to check in daily to watch what he’s doing. Can throw parties to watch some of the most influential and important people on the planet do the equivalent of digging ditches, refilling them, then doing it again.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I tried talking to them about the notion of breaking the monopoly of GIT & was talking about Fossil They literally went don’t care “Git is good enough” they’re literally talentless monkeys