BEIRUT (AP) — The fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government Sunday brought to a dramatic close his nearly 14-year struggle to hold onto power as his country fragmented amid a brutal civil war that became a proxy battlefield for regional and international powers.

Assad’s downfall came as a stark contrast to his first months as Syria’s unlikely president in 2000, when many hoped he would be a young reformer after three decades of his father’s iron grip. Only 34 years old, the Western-educated ophthalmologist was a rather geeky tech-savvy fan of computers with a gentle demeanor.

But when faced with protests against his rule that erupted in March 2011, Assad turned to the brutal tactics of his father in an attempt to crush them. As the uprising hemorrhaged into an outright civil war, he unleashed his military to blast opposition-held cities, with support from allies Iran and Russia.

International rights groups and prosecutors alleged widespread use of torture and extrajudicial executions in Syria’s government-run detention centers.

The Syrian war has killed nearly half a million people and displaced half the country’s pre-war population of 23 million. As the uprising spiraled into a civil war, millions of Syrians fled across the borders into Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Lebanon and on to Europe.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    Ironically, on Feb. 26, 20[1]1, two days after the fall of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak to protesters and just before the wave of Arab Spring protests swept into Syria — in an email released by Wikileaks as part of a cache in 2012 — Assad e-mailed a joke he’d run across mocking the Egyptian leader’s stubborn refusal to step down.

    “NEW WORD ADDED TO DICTIONARY: Mubarak (verb): To stick something, or to glue something. … Mubarak (adjective): slow to learn or understand,” it read.

    This is going to be a strange little footnote in history.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Promising to implement tariffs on everyone seems to be a good way to win folks over as well

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      But he had support from such upstanding groups as Hezbollah, the Iranians, and the Russians!

      • J4g2F@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        And he now being replaced by a group with ties to al Qaida, isis and Saudi Arabia. Of course being assholes themselves. They try really hard rebranding in name, not Ideas. Asad is bad, the people trying to get in power now are not better.

        • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          They try really hard rebranding in name, not Ideas. Asad is bad, the people trying to get in power now are not better.

          Do you have any specifics on this? Reports, analysis with reference to facts and data. Something along the lines of this article:

          How Syria’s ‘Diversity-Friendly’ Jihadists Plan on Building a State

          Not saying you are wrong, HTS and the rebels may well fracture. I guess we’ll find out.

          • J4g2F@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            First of all a link to a pro-Israël think tank is of no use for any discussion. Think-tanks in general are bad. Wikipedia washington institute

            On DuckDuckGo the second link is to the BBC on how the hack are hts and the current situation of you search for it. No think tank slop needed. BBC article

            To be honest they only want a “fundamentalist Islamic rule” state. Totally not a problem of course

            • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Conduct a thought experiment and imagine the article wasn’t written by that think tank.

              What part of the article is wrong and why? I will note, it doesn’t exactly embrace HTS. Please be specific. Happy to agree it is a bad source if you provide reasoned arguments and alternative data/analysis.

              The BBC article doesn’t provide any context beyond the following two sentences:

              For some time now, HTS has established its power base in the north-western province of Idlib where it is the de facto local administration, although its efforts towards legitimacy have been tarnished by alleged human rights abuses. … Since breaking with Al Qaeda, its goal has been limited to trying to establish fundamentalist Islamic rule in Syria rather than a wider caliphate, as IS tried and failed to do.

              The BBC article does not discuss public policy in rebel controlled areas or address HTS’s recent statements.

              I am not claiming to know the right answer. I don’t speak Arabic, I’ve never been to Syria and my in-person knowledge is largely limited to Syrian friends and acquaintances with whom I’ve lost contact with.

              I am genuinely curious about more in-depth information.

              • rodolfo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                Today it’s called think tank, yesterday it was propaganda. You don’t read propaganda and think it’s good and fine, do you?

                The article claims many things and, being propaganda, doesn’t give any proof. Ah… These events published in social media that everyone seems to know, described in such a fascinating writing style, but somehow are never linked to, embedded, ripped… At the beginning of the article. First two sentences. Bullshit from the start.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Not just a think tank, a think tank that is an unofficial representative of a foreign nation, deceptively sounding like something American.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        US backed Sisi in Egypt isnt better. Western backed factions in Libya arent better. Saudi Arabia isnt better, Iran isnt better.

        Who outside forces align with for their interests isnt a reflection of whether a leader is a tyrant or not. It is just bullshit peddled to pretend the tyrants supported by “our side” are somehow less tyrannical because they give us cheap ressources and allow their countries to be used as military staging areas.

        Down with all the tyrants and power to the people!

  • Stamau123@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Hope those 14 years of boozing it up in Damascus was worth the crater you’re buried in, jackass