- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
TL;DR for those who didn’t read the article- it’s going to basically offer users choices of programs to have pre-installed where they can basically customize their installation experience… but it’s all going to be predicated on their useless snap store. In other words, as usual the best way to experience Ubuntu is via some third-party variant.
If it wasn’t snap I could see it being pretty useful. Kind of like ninite for Ubuntu.
ninite of ubuntu and any other distro is just
sudo apt install package package package package .... replace package manager accordingly.super easy, barely an invonvenience. - ryan george.
Yeah, that’s what I do, but for beginners or those who like a graphical interface, this isn’t the worst thing. Like I said though, snap :/
I don’t like snaps either but I hate dealing with PPAs even more. I moved away from ubuntu years ago.
Realistically, if I’m using a minimal install, I probably want Debian for the stability anyways. It’s still too bad though, always nice to have options.
Brutal. It an option more distros need.
My experience with snap has been nothing but bad, I absolutely hate it.
Agree it sounds like a push for users to use snap more, but at the same time the “plan” doesn’t sound bad in it’s entirety - depending on how they design the installer experience. I could think of preselected profiles (like office, graphics, …) that install an (adjustable) set of applications upon install. They could be downloaded on-demand while installing the system.
@pnutzh4x0r they won’t benefit from the red hat stuff by pushing snap.
No serious user really chooses Ubuntu if they want a minimal install. Best options for that would be, arch, debian, alpine, or something like lubuntu.
Yes, I’m make the right move to switch from Kubuntu to KDE Neon before seeing this. Thanks OP for the info…
