I don’t tend to eat much fish, but in the supermarket earlier I saw some smoked salmon which didn’t need cooking, and some salmon fillets which did. They looked the same really - both ‘raw’. I decided to buy some of the fillet. It was nice, but a very different flavour from when I’ve tried smoked salmon in the past. The cooked fillet was quite chicken-y with a slight earthy/fishy taste, whereas smoked salmon has a very strong fish flavour.

Why do they taste so different? And why is smoked salmon safe to eat without cooking when other smoked fish do need cooking?

  • Countess425@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I they’re referring to cold smoking. It’s just smoking at a temp of like 80 degrees for like 18 hours or something. It’s how you make lox.

    • SleepyBear
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Traditional lox is just brined in salt, no smoking.

      Gravadlax is brined in salt and sugar with spices.

      Smoked salmon is just smoked salmon, like nova, in the US.

      Due to customer preference and lack of knowledge, most want smoked salmon when they ask for lox, so are sold lox.

      See: https://forward.com/news/7669/the-raw-truth-about-lox/