• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just a robots.txt flag that explicitly mentions a google user agent string. This is about as effective at stopping AI from training on your data as a “no trespassing” sign hidden behind the hedges of your unfenced lawn is at stopping trespassers.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We could put it on the various Lemmy sites, but it’s even more ineffective because of federation.

      Not sure what the analogy would be in that case, and infinite number of people get to decide if that sign exists on your lawn?

      edit: An infinite number of people have a copy of your lawn, and they need to put a sign on it

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So since what’s available now isn’t actually AI, what do we call it when we do get real AI? Will it be like what happened with HD? With True AI™ followed by Ultra AI™, AI4K™, and so on until we just call them master?

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Artificial Intelligence never meant AGI. AI was simply the attempt to build software that can solve problems that computers traditionally can’t do, but humans can. That includes stuff like chess, image recognition, language, etc. Exactly the kind of things AI has been getting really good at over the last decade.

      AGI on the other side is an autonomous AI system that can solve all the problems a human can solve, not just some. That’s frankly quite a bit more of a blurry concept, since what human can do is largely just an artifact of evolution and our environment, and also quite different between humans. AGI is not some magical point that has any significance in the underlying science and it’s unlikely we ever land on exactly that point, as capabilities are just so different between AI and humans and often far superior once we figured out the basics (e.g. StableDiffusion can paint images 1000x faster than a human, ChatGPT has more knowledge than any human ever had).

      Also AGI still doesn’t contain sentience, since that’s not really needed to replace a human.

      what do we call it when we do get real AI?

      The “real AI” is in the underlying algorithms, e.g. backpropagation. Those are the foundation of modern AI systems and those algorithms are what allows you to find pattern in the data. And they are the reason why the field is making seemingly such rapid progress, we can throw data at them and get good results. Our actual understanding why that all works is still somewhat limited, since those algorithms are what extracts the pattern from the data, not us.

      ChatGPT on the other side is just an application build with those algorithms and a lot of data. It’s interesting because we can play with it today, but AI models get thrown away and new ones get trained from scratch all the time.

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AGI (artificial general intelligence) is the current term for “The Concept Formerly Known As AI”. Not really a new term, but it’s only recently that companies decided that any algorithm can qualify as regular “AI” if they consider it good enough.