- cross-posted to:
- lemmy@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- lemmy@lemmy.ml
In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.
The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.
It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance
Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.
Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon
I’m very kinky. I’m also a biologist, and let me tell you, I was the least kinky mf in the entire study group which is mind-blowing.
If anybody in our group ever decided to come close to defending or entertaining the idea of anything to do with harming children or animals, they’d get beat up and would never come anywhere close to us or any of our communities.
There’s a difference. A huge one.
Ok, that has literally nothing to do with my argument, which is to not punish person x for what person y does.
I don’t think you’ve understood the point then.
The point of the thread is to hide an instance from search, which punishes more than just the unethical people OP is straw-manning about.
The instance itself is unethical if they allow this content.