It’s because they appear to be something they’re not.

They’re usually friendly and fun and do all sorts of employee retention activities like arranging go karting and such…

They seem like they’re there almost as union stewards, to try and help retain employees and ensure you’re treated well by management. This is not the case. They’re there to protect the company from lawsuits originated by you. This means that they’ll apply rules and such in ways that are not usually beneficial to you.

They’re actually really helpful if you have issues with a coworker! However, you need to remember that despite how friendly they seem, they’re not actually in your corner, they have their own agenda.

So the simple answer is that they aren’t bad at all, but it can feel bad if you thought they were your friend.

Nope, the ai will continue to get better, and soon spotting the fakes will be nearly impossible.

You don’t get to being the CEO of a large company without being an asshole of one type or another, and outrage drives views and clicks.

Soooo…. You get what you incentivise.

As a user, and great fan of the llama models….

I did not have “Zuckerberg saves us from ai” on my bingo card.

…… nor did I have “musk threatens and then pussies out from fighting Zuckerberg”

Or even “Zuckerberg becomes less despised as an individual”

Like…… have I switched timelines and universes?

Jesus Christ, that’s brutal.

Like you’re stabbing a corpse at this point good sir.

A CEOs job is literally to serve the financial interests of the shareholders.

In fact a CEO can be fired or charged for not doing it.

How is that not legally compelling a company to make the most money possible, when to have their top employee by the balls like that?

The article is a huge misrepresentation and the author is an idiot.

This took me a minute to figure out 😝

Yeah I acknowledged the shortcomings in a different comment.

It was a duct take solution for sure.

Intel PAE if the answer, but it still came with other issues, so 64 was still the better answer.

Also the entire article comes down to simple math.

Bits is the number of digits.

So like a 4 digit number maxes out at 9999 but an 8 digit number maxes out at 99 999 999

So when you double the number of digits, the max size available is exponential. 10^4 bigger in this case. It just sounds small because you’re showing that the exponent doubles.

10^4 is WAY smaller than 10^8

32 bit CPU’s having difficulty accessing greater than 4gb of memory was exclusively a windows problem.

It just feels like a toddlers tantrum…

You took my toy so I’m going to head-but the toy.

Ow my head hurts!

What an unbelievably stupid thing to do.

They get that viruses and new variants don’t respect geopolitical borders right?

Even people sometimes just wake up day and snap for reasons beyond our control.

Now you’re generally right, most of these cases there’s some meaningful details missing and the “no history of attacks” is a lie.

We just can’t broadly apply that because we don’t know which one isn’t a lie.

Until nvidia is onboard, it’s kinda meaningless.

Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, all the major ones. I’d like to think that Reddit is less affected by it than the rest of them, but I’m not certain that is accurate anymore.

…… I call this “exhibit A” for why I’m on lemmy.

Agreed, but the allure of fame and Facebook/YouTube made this behaviour worse.

Or at least gave the mom the tools to make it worse.

It’s when they tried to monetise it and then figured out that “to make the most money, we need people to stay on our site the longest” that things went to shit.

The algorithms soon learned that echo chambers of outrage worked great to maximize viewership.

And we all suffer more for it.

The algorithms designed to keep you there and sell you more are the real poison there, but I can’t say you’re wrong.

Perfect. Zero notes.

Social media should not be for kids.