That’s not what this article says. Earliest application was March 5, 2024.

Palworld was released on Jan 18th, 2024, a month and a half beforehand.

Am I the only one who feels like this is an AI generated article incorrectly summarizing the actual info?

If only she were the current sitting vice president of the United states of America, I.e. was in a position of power where she and the other members of the executive branch could take action as well as “striking a tough tone”.

Actions, as always, speak louder than words.

1. Mayor says the city will stop using tech by the end of 2024.

2. Tech is still operational in April 2024 (8 months before the end of 2024).

3. Breathless expose article showing that the tech is still in use.

4. Profit???

More like, OpenAI has said “so what if we were speeding, everyone does it” (did that work last time you got a ticket?)

Relevant exerpt from the article: “The company recently made a similar argument to the UK House of Lords, claiming no AI system like ChatGPT can be built without access to copyrighted content.”

The homeless guy down the street reckons the hospital was bombed by the aliens who live in his ballsack. Are they going to do an article reporting on that next?!

These recalls are sure to get less severe and happen less often if ford goes ahead with firing 10,000 senior experienced union members like they’re threatening to. /s

Bruh idk why the difference… Educate me?

I think that’s because you’re used to hearing dates said that way? Over here in DDMMYY-land, we often would say “20th of May, 2024” and that sounds equally sensical to me tbh

If Im reading the GitHub history right, this PR was accepted at age 3 years and 1 day? Guess the cake worked!

“the uploader has not made this video available in your country” 😔