1·
1 month agoor replying to week-old comments by someone doing the thing I find annoying.
Again, its five days since you posted your comment, not a week, and its just seen by me for the first time about two hours ago.
Cosmic Cleric
All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
- 1 Post
- 1.11K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Also, this is my new signature line, so thanks.
You’re welcome. I appreciate you helping out with normalizing signature lines.
The point you felt was worth making a week later
Again, five days ago. Some people like myself stumble upon a post/comment days and days later from when its initially posted.
is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?
Yeah, for some reason people who complain about me using a license seem to keep forgetting that option, but instead just continue to complain, for some strange reason, no matter how many times I remind them of that option. Thought it was a good PSA to remind the complainers they they have alternatives to complaining.
That seems a little extreme to me.
If that seems extreme to you, then you need to touch grass more often.
Extreme would be continuing to complain about something that you have the power to change, but don’t change.
What is that point?
at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment
You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.
You’re free to reply to a week-old comment, too, but neither is a great idea
Actually, five days, not a week.
And also, sometimes its just about making a point, even if you stumble upon something later on. 🤷
at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment
You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.
what are you going to do? Sue?
Personally? I let Creative Commons know what’s going on, that their licenses are being ignored.
I’m pretty sure they’d have something to say about the matter.
Ah well then I might try and find a license that doesn’t require attribution because I don’t care about that part.
I would argue attribution is also really important, as it forces them to expose publicly how they’re training their models, bringing awareness.
Nice off-topic comment. Pretty sure by now everybody is aware of that (and other posts) on the topic of using a license.
0·1 month agoDidn’t know what that stood for, I had to look it up.
I’m going to hope that’s wrong, and that it’s just a certain percentage in any professional caste that has bad apples.
I am willing to believe that the percentage of bad apples is larger in law enforcement, only because of the type of people who would gravitate to that type of position that would give them control over others, and how much money is spent on monitoring law enforcement personnel by the government for legal and ethics compliance, as well as mental suitability to do the job.
And no need to reply to me with every bad thing that’s ever been done by police officers. I read them all, here, as well as elsewhere. I just can’t subscribe to the 100% pop that ACAB stands for.
0·2 months agoCan you at least make the text smaller? That way people aren’t as bothered by it, but you still have your licence?
I already did actually, a couple of weeks ago.
I’m using the Lemmy web editor. The web client doesn’t let you change font sizes, but it does let you mark font as subscript or superscript, which is a smaller font size, so I did that.
My understanding is some mobile clients have problem with the subscript/superscript formatting, and the cause of that is on their end, not supporting the format text yet.
If you don’t see my license declaration in a smaller font, direct the devs of your client to look at this page, which is the formatting instructions from Lemmy, and specifically the subscript and superscript formatting.
01·2 months agoNice stats, thanks for sharing.
But you need to add one more stat, for paywalled or not, including if they count how many articles you’ve read before they put up the ‘must subscribe’ paywall.
If your comments are going to gum up the thread with a segment that they don’t think will have any effect, what’s a few more to match?
Well their comments are their responsibility, not mine (you shouldn’t ‘blame the victim’), so I can’t talk towards their actions, except to say that each of us are supposed to behave civilly here on Lemmy, and not bully others to conform.
Hahahahaha god damn what a load of bullshit. Did you also paste that image on Facebook?
Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.
That’s just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.
It’s actually not even my description, it’s one I got from someone else, who’s also licensing their content with the same license.
I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.
You have completely different motivations.
No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.
I don’t think the license does anything at all
ProPublica would disagree with you.
you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID
The specific license number is explicitly stated.
How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so?
Already discussed in that other conversation post.
This comment is explaining it very well: https://lemmy.ml/comment/10762134
I’ve explained myself quite well in that conversation.
And again, no need to repeat, it’s all there already. Unless you guys just enjoy repeating yourself again and again with zero effect.
Remember I’m pullin’ for ya–we’re all in this together. ✊🏼
Thanks, and no disrespect meant, but I would believe that more if you did license your own comments as well.
In case you need the formatting for it, here it is…
[~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)Feel free to replace the link to point to whatever license you wish to use for your own content, if you do not want to use the same one that I am using.
My guess is that people disagree with propagating the delusion that pasting that link in every comment helps with stopping AI from feeding on your input.
ProPublica disagrees with you.
But best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
“Coming soon to a species near you!”
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)