![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Any action other than assisting the invaders would be an improvement.
Any action other than assisting the invaders would be an improvement.
Yes, the oppressed are eager to hurt people any way they can, and nobody can expect it to be any other way.
But still, launching long range missiles isn’t an impulse action. There are so many actors domestic and internationally to do production, procurement, installation, logistics, assembly, that we can assume someone high up has made a strategic decision based on expected outcome.
And the expected outcome is extremely obvious: a) zero tactical gains, and b) more excuses to ignore international pressure and hit Rafah even more brutally.
No stupid questions.
No. Stupid questions.
No stupid! Questions!
No, stupid. Questions.
No! Stupid! Questions?
No shoes, no shirt, no stupid questions.
No stupid questions beyond this point.
There are no stupid questions.
We ain’t judging no stupid questions.
Statues (game) has been around since the eighties at least, and was one of the inspirations for the weeping angels.
Also, cats https://youtu.be/NbwpgyRUv5g
It’s so funny to be reminded of that period in the 90s where any first person game was described as a “DOOM clone”, because DOOM itself was the first FPS that hugely took off.
Товарищ американец! Байден старый, слабый и злой. Буквально вчера он назвал всех жителей Газы педофилами.
Хотя демократы хорошие, я воздержусь от голосования, чтобы сигнализировать об этом, и вы тоже должны это сделать.
First semifinal in just two days. If you have somewhere to watch it, I recommend it strongly.
Oh, and come on over and bring more life to !eurovision@lemmy.world :)
It says nothing, so you have copyright on it.
Adding a restrictive license to it only means as much as you’re willing and able to police it yourself and take others to court and argue that they can not assume the same freedom of use of your comments that they can with the rest of the site.
As an individual, for comments of two sentences each, this is not an option.
If they even notice it, they will say that the website TOS is the relevant license.
Eirher way, they will just go ahead and use it. None of us have the resources or perseverance to prove anything and take them to court in a meaningful way.
Where’s the harm in taking violent criminals, giving them a year of practice doing war crimes, traumatize them up a bit, and then releasing them into civilized society?
No, that’d be weird. You use artillery and soldiers.
The less soldiers you lose, the more you have left.
If you can expend more artillery, you can use less soldiers.
Assume I’m a psychopath C-level executive. Why would I spend huge resources on a success that earns money when I can earn money on fifty screwups instead?
One of them was my current employer when I was arguing about not managing to keep people on my team.
And I said exactly that, except didn’t walk out naturally. In another frustrated discussion I almost yelled “You can’t CHOOSE not to compete with them!”
-We offer a competitive salary.
-Places X, Y and Z offer much more.
-We don’t compete with them.
Stupidly enough - not satire. I’ve had this conversation with three different companies. They struggle to attract talent for some weird reason.
To answer the real question: “Everyone lives just as full a life as you, they think just as deeply as you do. Sure, people are brand loyal and don’t think about things for themselves sometimes. But you, Mr. People Are Sheep, do the same thing, just in other areas of your life.”
As put by https://www.reddit.com/r/rant/comments/kfqy94/if_you_have_a_people_are_sheep_mentality_you_are/
Putting on a veil of vagueness and choosing innocent sounding phrasings doesn’t hide this.
When trying to find the original top image, “male female hardcore” was a poor, poor choice of Google image search terms.
You have my deepfelt sympathies
You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.