Fair enough. Personally I’d start with their documentation then: https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/

For OS it looks like they support RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, and SUSE so I’d stick with one of those.

Openstack is like self-hosting your own cloud provider. My 2 cents is that it’s probably way overkill for personal use. You’d probably be interested in it if you had a lot of physical servers you wanted to present as a single pooled resource for utilization.

How does one install it?

From what I heard from a former coworker - with great difficulty.

What is the difference between a hypervisor/openstack/a container service (podman,docker)?

A hypervisor runs virtual machines. A container service runs containers which are like virtual machines that share the host’s kernel (more to it than that but that’s the simplest explanation). Openstack is a large ecosystem of pieces of software that runs the aforementioned components and coordinates it between a horizontally scaling number of physical servers. Here’s a chart showing all the potential components: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Openstack-map-v20221001.jpg

If you’re asking what the difference between a container service and a hypervisor are then I’d really recommend against pursuing this until you get more experience.

You’re conflating ‘country’ and ‘people’ then. The ‘country’ that gave up the land had this flag: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ae/Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg/2560px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png

Are you referring to the British Empire (who was a victor of WW2) or the Ottoman Empire (who no longer existed)?

Typically there’s a period of responsible disclosure to give the software maintainer an opportunity to fix it before it’s widely announced. After that period is up or the fix has been released the vulnerability discoverer is able to announce it and take credit for finding it.

I’m inclined to agree but you can read their stance here: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/01/beyond-platforms-private-censorship-parler-and-stack

The EFF heavily criticized AWS for removing Parler a few years ago for this reason.

My two cents is I’d say you’re a ‘manager’ if you have the power to hire people, fire them, discipline them, and determine their pay and working conditions.

Generally a “team lead” is just a more senior individual contributor that can help guide other individual contributors. Management may listen more heavily to their opinions on the matters above but they don’t have any direct control over it past advisory. Sometimes they may perform some light managerial functions like work allocations but they have no direct power to back that up.

They can't all be like the attorney general.

Fwiw if you can’t scrub it off then it’s probably not coming off in your food either

I smoke a cigar once every year or so and this sounds about right to me.

“Acca Dacca” killed me lol

To be fair it’s in response to a guy that started off by calling the programmers lazy.

I don’t really get the comparison to vagrant. It doesn’t seem like it feels the same role? Can distro box be used to share environments with other developers or used in CI/CD processes?

At least where I live condos and apartments aren’t treated as interchangeable terminology.

Eg if you check on Zillow

One. Use a switch for networking.

Generally not allowed to change the locks in an apartment anyways

People gettin fatter

You can only do 100M runs max anyways, just replace the whole thing? 100M of CAT6 is pretty cheap if you already have a box for it.

Or is this an academic question?

Only Internet facing devices would see this kind of traffic 10mb/day/per public IP address is still nothing unless you otherwise have essentially zero traffic. Typically only firewalls would have external IPs of the devices you mentioned and they wouldn’t have SSH bound to an external port

If you’re going to have lots of hosts running SSH you should setup a bastion/jump host for it anyways.