You would think that wouldn’t you? However you may be surprised to learn, they responded with outlook.com

I’m glad you get it!

Yes no clearly clearly. I never would have tried that. Thank you for your insight. I don’t know how I would have missed that. No clue just pure flabbergasted over here

And what email are you sending us in from?

Outlook

And which Outlook email account are you sending that from

Outlook

For your Outlook account does it say something like bob@outlook.com?

No it just says Outlook

…

Your daily reminder accelerationism posts are likely 70% Russian propiganda

Is this a bone appple teeth version of: De Nile isn’t just a river in Africa.

Anywhere that has the proper rock formations is a suitable long-term internment location. But as the other guy suggests, yeah you could stick it in his basement in a nuclear cask short term

it’s the most expensive form of energy due to massive regulations

So deregulate to the same standards Fossil Fuels are regulated at

the power plants take way too long to build

because of all of the red tape from your last point, as well as fossil fuel organized NIMBYS

nuclear waste is a problem, no one wants to have it buried near their homes

Again because disinformation spread by fossil fuel organized NIMBYS

the fissile material is already rare and difficult to come by, mostly sourced from politically difficult regions, such as fucking Russia

Breeder reactor

What?

Do you have any idea how many things we can do with basically free energy? Like for instance, desalinate and clean sea water and pump it back into our exhausted aquifers. Or use electrolysis to split some of that water and oxygen and hydrogen. Or scrub carbon from the atmosphere with gigantic manual filter aways. Or just store excess power in grid scale batteries and cycle plants on and off as needed.

Unfortunately, due to budget constraints, the editor has been fired and replaced with a stoned dog.

https://www.iaea.org/publications/15558/nuclear-energy-in-mitigation-pathways-to-net-zero

We will never run out of fuel for the next few 10 thousand years. And by that time we’ll probably have functional Dyson spheres.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occurrence_of_thorium

Have you tried running your command with the argument -y Or -Y

Foundations of geopolitics by Aleksander Dugan. This is the basis of modern European, conservative actions and the Russian playbook for the last 30 years.

You dolt there was never a problem with cooling the plants. The issue was that there is red tape that limits how much water the plant can discharge into the Rhine. That could have easily been addressed if the plants were just allowed to cycle more water. The higher the flow rate the colder the water will come out the other end . The water is put through a heat exchanger and then cycled back to the river. If more water can be piped through then the reactor can maintain lower temperatures.

I think you replied to the wrong person.

I wish i could send you a beer