![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/6f908f10-c6fa-4610-8be3-236e4ae0663d.webp)
Man these articles since the takeover are sharp
Man these articles since the takeover are sharp
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
It’s from an Apple commercial, which was an allusion to 1984
Helicopter was found in the meanwhile, no survivors
Kagi is great, but I just can’t miss $5 a month for it.
I’m using Qwant now and it’s pretty good.
Old railway lines in Europe often aren’t complete anymore and only cover relatively small distances.
There simply isn’t enough infrastructure to handle a full train network and fixing them up would probably require existing infrastructure and buildings to be disowned and destroyed.
The wheel is just there during the testing phase as a backup, seems the final pods don’t have it, as it would make the idea useless.
Copyright
I doubt that. Posts are supposed to encourage discussion. It’s a rule that’s fairly strictly moderated in most communities.
A yes or no question does not do that, it’s surprising the posts aren’t even removed outright.
Torrents are metadata files, they’re absolutely hosted on websites.
They only describe how your BitTorrent client can initiate the p2p connection, they obviously don’t have the actual data that’s shared, only info about that data.
The drive is not the issue.
Most Blu-Ray disks have DRM encryption. There simply doesn’t seem to be a (legal) decryption mechanism on PC, probably to avoid people ripping the movies.
Amazon support has been terrible for me, while AliExpress has come through almost every time.
Support from AliExpress is quite good. They don’t take any bullshit from their sellers and often refund at least a partial amount of your purchase.
I think I got 30% back once because the wrong color was delivered.
The biggest issue is that they tend to fake delivery time by switching around old tracking numbers. If you want something quick, I really wouldn’t recommend it.
I’ve had some bad sellers on AliExpress, but support tends to be quite good. They don’t take any bullshit from scam sellers.
Thanks, funniest comment today
Not sure what’s hard about that.
If you can convince someone inside a company to give you the credentials, a phone and Firestick is more than enough.
People seem to assume he did some movie magic hack. People are generally the weakest factor for companies, I assume that’s what he “attacked”
Not sure why this is down voted.
Besides being aggressive and destructive, he declared he will not stop doing crime.
This is not some “hero vs corporations” feel-good story as people seem to think here.
Not sure what “property” you are thinking of here?
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game