In my experience, you can’t expect it to deliver great working code, but it can always point you in the right direction.
There were some situations in which I just had no idea on how to do something, and it pointed me to the right library. The code itself was flawed, but with this information, I could use the library documentation and get it to work.

As a Rustacean, I’d rather use C than C++ for a small project.

That argument is basically saying homophobia is okay when the gay person is a horrible person.
If it was just that single person being hurt, it might be something different, but the problem discrimination is that it hurts all other members of that community.

Wait, Facebook did the same nonsense as well?

Not really, besides ml who are usually tankies (ml stands for Marxist Leninist and the mods delete anything against China, etc.)

No, if clauses are just with present or past tense or something like could, but you shouldn’t use would, only in the first part.

This is the biggest self-own I’ve seen in a long time lmao.
Yoshi’s Island has some of the best soundtrack, so much superior.

IntelliJ at least has a good open source version and it’s free for students

https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fiw&year=2024

Freedom in the world index. IMO the best indicator of how easy it is to live in a specific place.
While I wouldn’t call this shitpost accurate and I myself don’t really like it, you can’t say that the rough simplified categories don’t have any base.

Every dollar / euro / whatever invested in nuclear power should have been invested in real renewable energy for a bigger impact and a better sustainable transition to green energy.

It gets especially funny when you can’t use the powerplants in the summer anymore because it gets too hot for the cooling water like it has been in France.

Idk… you being forced to use your body against your will to reveal secret and private things sounds pretty awful to me

My number :O

Defederating doesn’t stop that, it just stops that their IP gets shared with us.

So the instances which can’t access Facebook content but can still be seen by Facebook… that will show 'em

There are plenty of good arguments in all the comments reacting to the comment and factually arguing why it’s just wrong. And I don’t even care about their political orientation (as if their blatant homophobic hadn’t given it away), but it doesn’t change whether the statement is right or wrong.
My point was just that your comment was essentially a shield against any disagreeing arguments (that you could say “I told you so” and not need to actually engage with the arguments) but didn’t even provide any arguments on its own.

Lmao. 10% are queer, get over it. Scientific evidence shows that gay animals exist in most species; for trans people look at other comments, it’s not worth my time typing that again.
The only one making dumb noises here is you (even literally: Just look at your sentences and your aggression, looks like you missed out on evolution).

What a neat way to directly delegitimize any different opinion, and that even without providing any arguments whatsoever.

From which country are you? What far left would there be on the US? The Democrats are ranging from center left to right-wing, from an EU view.
Saying both sides when there is one side prohibiting books about LGBTQ people, wanting to not allow trans people existing and trying to turn over democracy and the other one… wanting health care, is just utter bullshit.

That’s not my point. We’ve had good AIs and much development in that area of research already 50 years ago. Chess computers started being better than the best humans in the early 2000s. It’s not a particularly new field. But the development and research of artificial intelligence already completely stopped two times and it took over a decade each time to really start research in the field as well.
The reasons why this happened is because of too big promises; even if they succeeded in some things, they promised way too much. If they continue promising way too much in the current AI hype as well, I can see the exact same thing happening again: People getting disappointed and the field getting isolated for another decade.
I’m not saying the current successes will disappear, but that future development might, for a good while, just as it happened back then.

The worst part about is it that there have been already two winters in AI development, in the early twothousands and sometimes in the 70/80s? I think? because of exactly this: They always hyped up AI and said they’d solve all the world’s problems in a short time, and when that obviously didn’t happen, people got disappointed in it and pulled funding…