Thanks. Could you possibly elaborate? Why are they not equal?
I think it’s affirming the consequent
Can you send me the video?
If car, then vehicle = true
Car if and only if vehicle = true.
Is this correct?
Therefore “If A then B” = “A if and only if B” (or “If B then A” = “B if and only if A”)?
Is “If B then A” equal to “B if and only if A”?
We could potentially save children by persuading this psycho to rethink their choices
Don’t you want to help me convince this person that pedophilia is wrong/child sexual abuse and they shouldn’t support it?
And let me not enjoy them? 😉
At least it’s pagan though. A bit of an F you to the mainstream religions.
Or they get fined if they can’t get to a polling booth due to disability and poor disability access, or circumstances.
I think it forces a lot of idiots to just pick a box when they aren’t informed on politics at all. Probably skews the numbers a bit tbh.
Nice South Park reference! I guess you probably haven’t been penalised in any way or you’d know, so you can probably can get away with that. But isn’t it technically illegal to not cast a proper vote in Australia? (I think compulsory voting is stupid so I don’t blame you btw)
Isn’t that illegal? I think it’s legal in the UK though, someone told me it’s tradition to draw a big cross on the whole ballot paper and they actually count no-votes as distinct from non-votes, or something like that.
Follow-up question: If voting is mandatory, but you don’t want to vote for any of the parties, what are you expected to do?
In order words, why is voting mandatory in Australia, but not UK, US, Canada or New Zealand?
What’s with all the downvotes with no explanation?
Well I completely agree with you there 😂
Yeah I understand, and that does probably happen a lot. But we also seem to live in an age where we assume the worst of people… so even though it’s possible to partly agree with someone while genuinely condemning other aspects of that person, people are somehow certain that others are using that as a gateway to awful shit, as you say. (Not talking about you, of course.)
… I’m not sure what the opposite of toxic positivity is, but probably not that. Basically acknowledging problems and working from there in a positive direction, rather than simply denying problems and pretending everything’s fine when it isn’t. A google search tells me “tragic optimism” can be described as the opposing concept, whether that fits or not.
I think I understand now, but what has left me scratching my nose (metaphorically):
Why is it called “B if and only if A”, if what it really means is “B only if A and vice versa”? (Am I correct in thinking that’s what it means?)
I just don’t understand how that translates grammatically. To me, “B if and only if A” sounds the same as “B only if A”. I can accept that they mean different things in the context of logic, just like I can assign any meaning to any label, like I could say that “dog” now means “kite” in a certain context. But it seems unintuitive and doesn’t really make sense to me. Does that make sense?