"All of them. Ideally.
… Oh shit, I said that second part oht loud, didn’t I?"
- Every “AI” CEO ever…
"All of them. Ideally.
… Oh shit, I said that second part oht loud, didn’t I?"
The problem wasn’t having a problem. The problem was “fixing” the problem by introducing more problems.
“… by the way, we’ve already sold that feature I made up to two customers, so …”
That doesn’t mean it’s magically OK to be so irresponsible that you put others in danger.
No, that sounds more like you have a sleep issue you are neglecting and now you’re making it everyone else’s problem…
Grow up and fix yourself before you start being proud about being broken, ffs. If it’s remotely a problem to stay awake after sleep and caffeine, you should be talking to doctors.
Nah, this is much worse. It’s like any effective con: Make it absurd at face value so the only people you deal with are already selected to be foolish rubes.
Too bad the US is full of foolish rubes… Hopefully not over half, but I’m not holding my breath.
Oh come on, you’ve watched this farce for how long and still ask that question? He’ll be released and immediately pardon himself for anything and everything he can, and literally go to war against the states that still want to hold him accountable.
This might’ve worked if Netflix cared what so ever about quality.
BTRFS is smart enough to check for file errors in some situations under normal operations (I forget which, it’s been a while). When it finds issues, it puts it in read only to try and prevent things from going off of potentially corrupt data.
NTFS, which is what Windows usually uses, is a very “dumb” file system. It is merely a record of what files exist where, so if data corrupts, it will only throw NTFS off if it’s in the file index it stores itself. If it’s in the middle of your file, NTFS doesn’t know and doesn’t care and will just give you the wonky data.
Windows seemingly continuing to work is just a consequence of the “dumb” file system. It will take some critical file getting corrupted before Windows or some program will just crash. At least BTRFS is trying to tell you things are looking amiss and you should definitely back up anything important.
No, the problem is with APPLE’S IMPLEMENTATION of HOW Apple allows third party stores through Safari. NOT with third party browsers themselves. Please learn to read.
Well that’s just Apple “innovation”. You’re clearly not brilliant enough to understand the long term plan of greedy morons Apple.
I’d argue the problem isn’t “browsers”, but Apple’s closed ecosystem clashing with a more secured internet. They do not need to do it this way, which makes it their fault.
That’s not what’s said in the article. At all. What so ever.
The problem isn’t suddenly allowing third party browsers. It’s that Apple’s implementation to allow that in Safari sends out info about sites visited with those app stores. It allows snooping of what 3rd party things people use.
Seriously blows my mind how toxic some guys get with it. I just treat it like an extension of them. If that’s how they treat people they like, I take it as a sign they’re a piece of shit who’ll really mistreat someone they don’t like. That makes them a bad person in my book, regardless of how twisted or self-imposed it is.
The only problem the Luddites had is they went and busted the machines instead of the rich owners’ kneecaps.
If you say, “they did that too!” Well, NOT ENOUGH!!
Just like the electoral college. They CHOSE Trump in some places.
It seems the ultimate problem is giving individual people authority at all, because they’re all too stupid and corruptable.
You realize most people ONLY wipe when they poop, …right?
If you’re not an AI, you should go back to school, because you’re fucking stupid using an anecdote to dismiss data. Fucking pathetic.
Enforcers only become rulers when they’re given both immunity and the ability to make shit up.
The fact you fundamentally do not understand the difference between rule maker and rule enforcer is pathetic.
If you like the concept, then maybe understand how it’s actually supposed to function. Rules HAVE to exist. Enforcers HAVE to exist. How do you do that fairly? Yes, nature has tendencies, which is why humans create rules and enforcers to resist natural tendencies.
Humans are supposed to be GREATER than “dumb animals”, yet all I ever hear is people whining about how it it’s unnatural… NO SHIT!! That’s the entire point!!
In nature, the strong eat the weak, the end. Game over. We need to create rules and enforcers to make a better environment than is natural. Creating rules requires at least a temporary “ruler” (that doesn’t ‘have’ to be a single person). If you claim ANY ruler is ALWAYS bad, you are quite literally forgetting how not-nature works in its entirety.
The fact you still do not understand the difference between rule maker and rule enforcer is pathetic. Anarchy is literally beyond your comprehension.
Rules HAVE to exist. In some form. They HAVE to be enforced in some form. If you assume any enforcer is a boot of a “ruler”, you are literally missing the entire point.
Literally not what people are talking about. It’s the “AI” part of the task that doesn’t leave the device (unless it prompts to ask chat gpt). Not that it can magically gleam live info without making any request to the web…
Jeeze, fucking… get your shit straight, making me defend Apple… Fucking do better.