I like how the article has several links to things it mentions, but doesn’t link to Have I Been Pwned at all even though that’s the key site of the whole thing and where the reader should go to see if they’re affected. Well done, article.
I like how the article has several links to things it mentions, but doesn’t link to Have I Been Pwned at all even though that’s the key site of the whole thing and where the reader should go to see if they’re affected. Well done, article.
Some what? Iranians?
Hey! That sounds like pure communism! You go to work where the overseer can keep an eye on you and your productivity!
Since the user can select to show unverified software I’m very much in favor of this. As long as it’s still very visible that a package is unverified after you changed the setting. With security being one of the main selling points of Flatpaks, there should be a clear distinction between verified and unverified packages, and the goal should be that all packages should be verified.
I really wouldn’t, because I wouldn’t want to risk them succeeding. It could be like Meta with WhatsApp, they just say “sure anyone can interoperate with us, they just have to use the Signal protocol because it’s the safest and what we use”. Google et al could say “any system could be considered trusted, as long as these security criteria are met” and the criteria are such that they go completely against the form of user control of the OS and software that Linux is all about. Technically a Linux distro could be made to meet the requirements, but pretty much no current day Linux user would ever want to use it because they’d be giving up the thing that made them switch to Linux in the first place - their control.
Had anybody, ever, claimed that to be the case?
That’s a great idea. We can just funnel the wind through the straws straight to the equipment that needs power.
I’m still very confused as to what you’re trying to say in this thread.
How about cardboard derivatives?
And your point is what exactly?
Guess which OS won’t be recognized as a “trusted environment” to visit websites with down the line in Google’s upcoming Web DRM. For your own protection of course…
Capitalism almost perfected.
Splendid logic.
So I should start supporting Israel instead?
…for now.
'Murcia!
How mature.
“Besides, the more incorrect answers - the more time users will spend on our site and use our service to get the correct answer = more ads shown = more profit!”
Is this a meme? Every time I’ve seen someone use fetch there’s always someone telling them to stop trying to make it a thing. I love it either way and I will henceforth do my part.
I like this graph a lot. It’s different, beautiful and gives a good overview. The colors could have been slightly better though.