Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.

  • 0 Posts
  • 339 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle


  • 5 node proxmox cluster (each node on 40gbps networking[yes ceph…], ~80TB of SSD storage, 180cores, ~630GB of ram total)
    1 slow storage node (~400TB)
    2x opnsense servers in HA
    2x icx7750s
    2x icx7450s

    PoE to all the things… and 8gbps internet.

    Usually run ~15-17amps. So about 2000 watts. It’s my baby datacenter.

    Sometime this month I’ll be installing 25000kwh solar system on my roof and batteries.

    As far as heat goes… It’s in the garage with an insulated door, heat pump water heater, and there’s a tripplite ac unit in the bottom of the rack. The waste air(from the a/c) exhausts outside through a direct vent in the wall. The garage is downright tolerable to me for extended periods of time. The servers don’t complain at all.

    Reading about all you guys being under 200w or whatever makes me wonder if it’s worth it. Then I realize that the cost to do even a 1/4 of what I do in the cloud is more expensive than buying my solar.

    Power costs for the rack is about $100-120 a month. If it wasn’t for solar.

    Edit: 75 LXC containers, 22VMs.


  • Ya’ll have issues with logic it seems.

    You know what you could have done? Shrank coal and oil combined EVEN MORE! And by your own sources production capabilities were increasing. Why would they be doing that if the goal is to get rid of it all together? There is a cost to building that production capability you know. But at this point I’m talking to brick walls. None of you can actually string together a valid reason why nuclear was killed in FAVOR of the shit polluting the air.




  • Looking at the second image. That’s factually wrong. Natural gas generators increased in capacity while nuclear is being killed. The whole process of killing nuclear has been over time period considerably greater than apologists like you tend to look at.

    But you do you. If nuclear was allowed to stay active they could have killed off ALL hard coal and some natural gas at this point.







  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlCan I refuse MS Authenticator?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because that shit only works in fantasy land.

    Glad to know my company, and the companies I contract for are fantasy land then.

    employees WILL expect support

    And they will get it if they use the company default options.

    Nothing about this is losing. I’m CIO for 3 separate companies (2 by contract). None of them have issues with this type of policy. We do bare minimum to not limit the toolset they can use and support a specific set of tools that we like the best. That’s it. Those who are smart enough to use their own tools clearly know enough about IT to make good decisions that we can trust. The rest use the default tools… and we support those tools explicitly.

    More importantly, we’re not shitting on those who ARE making good decisions overall, but just have a preference. That makes the employees feel heard and keeps them happy. Keeping them happier keeps everyone more productive.


  • This is disingenuous though… You can simply reset the TOTP seed on any account to achieve the same operation. We use AuthLite on a local domain… I can disable an account domain-wide by simply resetting the TOTP seed or disabling the account. Using an Azure domain and MS app doesn’t add any value in that regards. All of the online office stuff can be linked onto a local domain as well and would also be disabled.


  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlCan I refuse MS Authenticator?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m pushing to make us exclusive because I’m sick of the IT support guys trying to support a dozen apps.

    While I understand this… Why not just refuse to support and NOT remove the capability for all those who don’t need support and work just fine with their own? It’s not like TOTP isn’t a solved problem at this point.

    Eg. “we only support MS auth, If you choose to use your own you will not receive any company support.”


  • Not sure I understand what the faraday cage would accomplish. It’s the companies device. You’d be skipping this presumption outlined earlier in the thread

    they are entitled and expected to track it as much as my work laptop or any other company equipment.

    Leaving the work phone at work is a valid answer to me. Assuming that doesn’t actually come with any other downsides (working offsite and having to return to the office on unpaid time just to drop off the phone for example).


  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlCan I refuse MS Authenticator?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Or I brought up a point that you didn’t consider, and rather than addressing it you need to resort to low level ad hominem. You contradicted yourself. Either explain the contradiction or move on. There’s no point in this comment unless you’re attempting to discredit me without reason which just makes you look bad.


  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlCan I refuse MS Authenticator?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Your point is illogical.

    You stated

    they are entitled and expected to track it

    Just to turn around and back-peddle

    If I don’t want them tracking me I just turn it off

    Are they entitled to it or not? If they’re entitled, then why do you have a right to cut it off? I’d argue they have no right to it to track me off hours at all… regardless of the device used. u2f tokens like yubikey would be just as sufficient for 2fa with none of the tracking.